Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2022 0:19:37 GMT
Brendan Rodgers at Leicester hasn’t been given a penny to spend this Summer, but he’s got players lined up to quickly buy next week if Fofana goes to Chelsea for £80m. There is ZERO excuse for Sandgaard not to sign us a striker in the next few days. He’s had nearly four months. And when we do you will be the first to say he’s shit Sessegnon & Wolliacott have been very good signings this Summer. I judge players having actually watched them play for us. |
|
|
|
Post by 1978sussex on Aug 27, 2022 10:11:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by norfolkrobin on Aug 27, 2022 11:21:03 GMT
Baller,IF Blackpool come knocking again because they lose Bowler send them packing TS! BG rates CK and rightly so. |
|
|
|
Post by bexleyboy on Aug 28, 2022 11:48:40 GMT
Brendan Rodgers at Leicester hasn’t been given a penny to spend this Summer, but he’s got players lined up to quickly buy next week if Fofana goes to Chelsea for £80m. There is ZERO excuse for Sandgaard not to sign us a striker in the next few days. He’s had nearly four months. Strange post .. Leicester getting 80 mill for one player being compared to us  ? unless we are getting 80 mill for a player then there no sense in this post at all |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2022 12:26:37 GMT
Brendan Rodgers at Leicester hasn’t been given a penny to spend this Summer, but he’s got players lined up to quickly buy next week if Fofana goes to Chelsea for £80m. There is ZERO excuse for Sandgaard not to sign us a striker in the next few days. He’s had nearly four months. Strange post .. Leicester getting 80 mill for one player being compared to us ? unless we are getting 80 mill for a player then there no sense in this post at all Leicester’s situation is identical to ours in that neither club’s owner has any money to spend, as is relying on outgoings. Rodgers says Leicester has targets lined up if Fofana is sold….I’m asking if Sandgaard has done the same (albeit for £79,999,999 less). |
|
|
|
Post by manikin on Aug 28, 2022 12:30:00 GMT
Brendan Rodgers at Leicester hasn’t been given a penny to spend this Summer, but he’s got players lined up to quickly buy next week if Fofana goes to Chelsea for £80m. There is ZERO excuse for Sandgaard not to sign us a striker in the next few days. He’s had nearly four months. Strange post .. Leicester getting 80 mill for one player being compared to us ? unless we are getting 80 mill for a player then there no sense in this post at all Not really , Sandgaard has had money coming in during this window but it's still in his pocket, whereas Leicester are looking to spend if Fofana goes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2022 12:58:17 GMT
Strange post .. Leicester getting 80 mill for one player being compared to us ? unless we are getting 80 mill for a player then there no sense in this post at all Not really , Sandgaard has had money coming in during this window but it's still in his pocket, whereas Leicester are looking to spend if Fofana goes. in his pocket or gone on overheads? |
|
|
|
Post by tonaddick on Aug 28, 2022 13:19:20 GMT
Not really , Sandgaard has had money coming in during this window but it's still in his pocket, whereas Leicester are looking to spend if Fofana goes. in his pocket or gone on overheads? Same thing if you look at Brent's interview earlier in the season with RC. He made it clear that there was one account that was for both incomings and outgoings; the outgoings include his regular trips to the UK, which some believe are on private jet hires. Incomings have been fairly regular as players have been sold and sell on clauses activated. That's where we may be different from Leicester - their income has been minimal. On the private jet hire, if true, it would be interesting to compare that cashflow with the crooks' cashflow for leasing the cars that they traipsed about in. |
|
|
|
Post by manikin on Aug 28, 2022 13:30:08 GMT
Not really , Sandgaard has had money coming in during this window but it's still in his pocket, whereas Leicester are looking to spend if Fofana goes. in his pocket or gone on overheads? If he can't cover the overheads at this level he shouldn't own a football club. |
|
|
|
Post by Mundell on Aug 28, 2022 14:10:26 GMT
in his pocket or gone on overheads? Same thing if you look at Brent's interview earlier in the season with RC. He made it clear that there was one account that was for both incomings and outgoings; the outgoings include his regular trips to the UK, which some believe are on private jet hires. Incomings have been fairly regular as players have been sold and sell on clauses activated. That's where we may be different from Leicester - their income has been minimal. On the private jet hire, if true, it would be interesting to compare that cashflow with the crooks' cashflow for leasing the cars that they traipsed about in. Are you suggesting that Sandgaard might be claiming travel expenses so that the club are paying for his use of private jets? On one level, it’s all his money and fungible, but it’s a terrible look if this is true, though entirely consistent with the personality type. My recollection is that Duchatelet travelled by train (all the way to Charlton) and I’ll bet he didn’t expense the costs. I wonder if a majority of fans will one day realise that on a personal level Sandgaard is much more objectionable than the Belgian? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2022 14:32:30 GMT
We want our Roland Back. We want our Roland back 🎵
|
|
|
|
Post by tonaddick on Aug 28, 2022 14:45:43 GMT
Same thing if you look at Brent's interview earlier in the season with RC. He made it clear that there was one account that was for both incomings and outgoings; the outgoings include his regular trips to the UK, which some believe are on private jet hires. Incomings have been fairly regular as players have been sold and sell on clauses activated. That's where we may be different from Leicester - their income has been minimal. On the private jet hire, if true, it would be interesting to compare that cashflow with the crooks' cashflow for leasing the cars that they traipsed about in. Are you suggesting that Sandgaard might be claiming travel expenses so that the club are paying for his use of private jets? On one level, it’s all his money and fungible, but it’s a terrible look if this is true, though entirely consistent with the personality type. My recollection is that Duchatelet travelled by train (all the way to Charlton) and I’ll bet he didn’t expense the costs. I wonder if a majority of fans will one day realise that on a personal level Sandgaard is much more objectionable than the Belgian? Based on that interview and on claims made by, I think, Reams, it is a possibility. However, we won't know exactly what is going on until the accounts are published. I can't see a reason why TS would be travelling to the UK on anything other than a business class ticket, but perhaps he's always wanted a rock star lifestyle. I have a real fear we are being asset stripped ahead of a sale. The problem being that he has very few assets to sell, which may explain some of the claims on the other thread about cost cutting measures and the behaviours driving them. On your last point I fear the big problem is that so many people bought into the anyone but Roland narrative that it would take a huge internal conversion to accept that TS is worse than RD. As long as he buys them a pint in the Oak and doesn't start use flemish he'll be in credit. |
|
stu2020
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 295
|
Post by stu2020 on Aug 28, 2022 14:55:27 GMT
Are you suggesting that Sandgaard might be claiming travel expenses so that the club are paying for his use of private jets? On one level, it’s all his money and fungible, but it’s a terrible look if this is true, though entirely consistent with the personality type. My recollection is that Duchatelet travelled by train (all the way to Charlton) and I’ll bet he didn’t expense the costs. I wonder if a majority of fans will one day realise that on a personal level Sandgaard is much more objectionable than the Belgian? Based on that interview and on claims made by, I think, Reams, it is a possibility. However, we won't know exactly what is going on until the accounts are published. I can't see a reason why TS would be travelling to the UK on anything other than a business class ticket, but perhaps he's always wanted a rock star lifestyle. I have a real fear we are being asset stripped ahead of a sale. The problem being that he has very few assets to sell, which may explain some of the claims on the other thread about cost cutting measures and the behaviours driving them. On your last point I fear the big problem is that so many people bought into the anyone but Roland narrative that it would take a huge internal conversion to accept that TS is worse than RD. As long as he buys them a pint in the Oak and doesn't start use flemish he'll be in credit. How can he asset strip if the Belg still owns all the assets? I don't that as the reality, more likely he thought owning a club was a bit if fun but has decided he won't... or can't... invest much. |
|
|
|
Post by tonaddick on Aug 28, 2022 15:01:02 GMT
Based on that interview and on claims made by, I think, Reams, it is a possibility. However, we won't know exactly what is going on until the accounts are published. I can't see a reason why TS would be travelling to the UK on anything other than a business class ticket, but perhaps he's always wanted a rock star lifestyle. I have a real fear we are being asset stripped ahead of a sale. The problem being that he has very few assets to sell, which may explain some of the claims on the other thread about cost cutting measures and the behaviours driving them. On your last point I fear the big problem is that so many people bought into the anyone but Roland narrative that it would take a huge internal conversion to accept that TS is worse than RD. As long as he buys them a pint in the Oak and doesn't start use flemish he'll be in credit. How can he asset strip if the Belg still owns all the assets? I don't that as the reality, more likely he thought owning a club was a bit if fun but has decided he won't... or can't... invest much. I meant playing assets as that is all that he owns - we've sold anybody who has created even a sniff of interest. I fully expect Gilbey, Magilliviray and JFC to leave for fees with no new signings coming in. I fully accept that free transfers coming in create a charge, but we've been fishing in Lowe level pools to us so I can't imagine our wage bill has increased. I know that its an unpopular opinion, but I'll be eternally grateful to RD for keeping a hold of the ground and Sparrows Lane when he decided to get rid of playing element. Had he not, we'd really be deep in the brown stuff now, instead of just wading in the shallows. |
|
stu2020
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 295
|
Post by stu2020 on Aug 28, 2022 15:17:03 GMT
How can he asset strip if the Belg still owns all the assets? I don't that as the reality, more likely he thought owning a club was a bit if fun but has decided he won't... or can't... invest much. I meant playing assets as that is all that he owns - we've sold anybody who has created even a sniff of interest. I fully expect Gilbey, Magilliviray and JFC to leave for fees with no new signings coming in. I fully accept that free transfers coming in create a charge, but we've been fishing in Lowe level pools to us so I can't imagine our wage bill has increased. I know that its an unpopular opinion, but I'll be eternally grateful to RD for keeping a hold of the ground and Sparrows Lane when he decided to get rid of playing element. Had he not, we'd really be deep in the brown stuff now, instead of just wading in the shallows. I see where you are coming from, but really how can an owner really invest in a club..ground upkeep/ development etc. unless he owns it fully? Would you invest heavily in a house you were renting... the team is another matter..TS knew what he was buying into but I just think he never understood the investment in the team required for real success...hence the reckless bravado spouted about our prospects.... he's trying to win promotion on the cheap.. it's just unlikely to happen unfortunately |
|
|
|
Post by AndyAddick on Aug 28, 2022 15:21:54 GMT
in his pocket or gone on overheads? If he can't cover the overheads at this level he shouldn't own a football club. And certainly should not be billing the club for private jets !! |
|
|
|
Post by tonaddick on Aug 28, 2022 15:33:03 GMT
I meant playing assets as that is all that he owns - we've sold anybody who has created even a sniff of interest. I fully expect Gilbey, Magilliviray and JFC to leave for fees with no new signings coming in. I fully accept that free transfers coming in create a charge, but we've been fishing in Lowe level pools to us so I can't imagine our wage bill has increased. I know that its an unpopular opinion, but I'll be eternally grateful to RD for keeping a hold of the ground and Sparrows Lane when he decided to get rid of playing element. Had he not, we'd really be deep in the brown stuff now, instead of just wading in the shallows. I see where you are coming from, but really how can an owner really invest in a club..ground upkeep/ development etc. unless he owns it fully? Would you invest heavily in a house you were renting... the team is another matter..TS knew what he was buying into but I just think he never understood the investment in the team required for real success...hence the reckless bravado spouted about our prospects.... he's trying to win promotion on the cheap.. it's just unlikely to happen unfortunately It seems to work ok on the continent with lots of big teams not owning their own stadiums. And West Ham seem to be doing ok. I take your point on renting, but I'd take in another direction as it means TS doesn't have an excuse not to invest in the team. I'd buy decent furniture to make it into somewhere I wanted to live. If only TS would invest in a decent sofa to play up top. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2022 16:49:30 GMT
We want our Roland Back. We want our Roland back 🎵 To be fair to “Nasty Roland”, when he was owner the staff didn’t have to create an anonymous Twitter account to tell the fanbase that they were being bullied. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2022 16:50:30 GMT
Based on that interview and on claims made by, I think, Reams, it is a possibility. However, we won't know exactly what is going on until the accounts are published. I can't see a reason why TS would be travelling to the UK on anything other than a business class ticket, but perhaps he's always wanted a rock star lifestyle. I have a real fear we are being asset stripped ahead of a sale. The problem being that he has very few assets to sell, which may explain some of the claims on the other thread about cost cutting measures and the behaviours driving them. On your last point I fear the big problem is that so many people bought into the anyone but Roland narrative that it would take a huge internal conversion to accept that TS is worse than RD. As long as he buys them a pint in the Oak and doesn't start use flemish he'll be in credit. How can he asset strip if the Belg still owns all the assets? I don't that as the reality, more likely he thought owning a club was a bit if fun but has decided he won't... or can't... invest much. In which case, put you £1 investment in the football side up for sale, and fcuk off. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2022 16:51:42 GMT
Not really , Sandgaard has had money coming in during this window but it's still in his pocket, whereas Leicester are looking to spend if Fofana goes. in his pocket or gone on overheads? Nick Pope sell on fee & 7,300 ST sold. There’s around £3m right there. |
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Aug 28, 2022 17:40:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Aug 28, 2022 17:42:08 GMT
Leaving a player out because if he plays one more game his wages will increase tells you all you need to know about bullyboy.
|
|
stu2020
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 295
|
Post by stu2020 on Aug 28, 2022 20:13:49 GMT
How can he asset strip if the Belg still owns all the assets? I don't that as the reality, more likely he thought owning a club was a bit if fun but has decided he won't... or can't... invest much. In which case, put you £1 investment in the football side up for sale, and fcuk off. Generally that is not possible in investment unless you are willing to cover existing debt, this was not the case with the sale of the club so not relevant |
|
|
|
Post by aaronaldo on Aug 28, 2022 20:27:24 GMT
Unpopular opinion most likely, but we need a CB more than we need a striker.
(I’m not saying we don’t need a striker btw, before anyone reads this and decides that’s what I mean…)
|
|
|
|
Post by willett on Aug 28, 2022 21:13:49 GMT
I’d rather Deji was bought back rather than some probably average defender signed on loan.
Think we still need at least three players.
|
|
|
|
Post by willett on Aug 28, 2022 21:14:42 GMT
We want our Roland Back. We want our Roland back 🎵 He still owns our ground and training ground, so hasn’t really gone anywhere at all. |
|
|
|
Post by norfolkrobin on Aug 28, 2022 21:42:45 GMT
We want our Roland Back. We want our Roland back 🎵 He still owns our ground and training ground, so hasn’t really gone anywhere at all. Sadly I agree,Roland holds all the cards,but we have a face man who talks a good game,but ultimately hasn't kicked us on....fixation on academy status,delusions of intelligence("football is easy") and a nice bit of nepotism aswell....God help us all,but BG first. |
|
|
|
Post by aucklandaddick on Aug 28, 2022 22:03:43 GMT
I’d rather Deji was bought back rather than some probably average defender signed on loan. Think we still need at least three players. After watching those Wycombe centre backs completely boss Stockley on Saturday I would prefer someone of that quality to come in rather than Deji TBH…. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2022 7:27:19 GMT
Tom Cannon is a 19 year old Irish kid who signed for Everton last year.
A club of that size has its pick of the North West’s many clubs when it comes to loaning out their kids.
It really is a massive stretch of the imagination to think that Charlton are on Everton’s radar. There’s just no link there.
|
|
|
|
Post by cafcfan32 on Aug 29, 2022 9:14:17 GMT
in his pocket or gone on overheads? Nick Pope sell on fee & 7,300 ST sold. There’s around £3m right there. We are yet to receive any instalment payment from Burnley for Nick Pope so that is not money we have. You cant spend it until you have it. |
|
