|
|
Post by sevenoaks on Jan 30, 2024 19:42:07 GMT
Duff early favourite for Huddersfield Post.
|
|
|
|
Post by pardew123 on Jan 30, 2024 19:43:15 GMT
Moore wants to remain up north I read somewhere don’t think he’s right fit here anyway decent manager all the same
|
|
|
|
Post by norfolkrobin on Jan 30, 2024 19:48:45 GMT
The reason I'm hoping it's Jones or Rowatt is because they carry an authority with them. It's part of their make up. Scott would be well put in his place if any of those two arrive. Any of the other candidates I'm sure Scott would want to try and dictate. Best two available candidates IMHO. C'mon SE7 wrap this up tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Post by acientaddick4 on Jan 30, 2024 19:50:22 GMT
I am sickened by the Unproffessionalism of this current Board. I have supported Charlton for 65 years and never have we been seen as such a basket case.Yes the Spivs were a joke but it was obvious that they were a bunch of Criminals and fans of other clubs felt sorry for us and were even sympathetic. Saanguard was well meaning but out of his depth.
This current bunch are beyond belief. Methven was humiliated by the Sunerland documentary yet him and his highly paid colleges continue in the same disjointed way. This constant leaking of confidential info and dumping storylines to allegedly ITK fans is just to control the narrative to cover up incompetence.
I really think we should write an open letter to The Majority Owners expressing our disgust at the total lack of joined up thinking and knee jerk decisions.As usual the selection of a new manager is not only 2 months too late but conducted in a cringeworthy manner. I will eagerly await Ream's investigation
|
|
|
|
Post by Mundell on Jan 30, 2024 19:51:24 GMT
Not sure Jones Duff or Warburton are sitting at home worrying whats being written in fans forums …. if Jones gets offered the post he will take it like many others out of work That’s probably right, but you’ve completely missed the point. The point is the CAFC’s SMT is seriously undermining its own credibility. It currently appears to be incompetent and shambolic. And that’s from someone who has been positive!! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2024 19:58:06 GMT
I am sickened by the Unproffessionalism of this current Board. I have supported Charlton for 65 years and never have we been seen as such a basket case.Yes the Spivs were a joke but it was obvious that they were a bunch of Criminals and fans of other clubs felt sorry for us and were even sympathetic. Saanguard was well meaning but out of his depth. This current bunch are beyond belief. Methven was humiliated by the Sunerland documentary yet him and his highly paid colleges continue in the same disjointed way. This constant leaking of confidential info and dumping storylines to allegedly ITK fans is just to control the narrative to cover up incompetence. I really think we should write an open letter to The Majority Owners expressing our disgust at the total lack of joined up thinking and knee jerk decisions.As usual the selection of a new manager is not only 2 months too late but conducted in a cringeworthy manner. I will eagerly await Ream's investigation Absolutely bang on! |
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Jan 30, 2024 19:59:53 GMT
Like I said I just don't buy it.
All the interviewing is done. They discuss them and Jones is the most impressive interviewee.
They then have a show of hands and not all of the go up.
Next thing we hear is they suddenly decide they want to interview somebody else with the majority of the board having already nailed their names to the Nathan Jones mast.
Total nonsense in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Jan 30, 2024 20:00:47 GMT
I am sickened by the Unproffessionalism of this current Board. I have supported Charlton for 65 years and never have we been seen as such a basket case.Yes the Spivs were a joke but it was obvious that they were a bunch of Criminals and fans of other clubs felt sorry for us and were even sympathetic. Saanguard was well meaning but out of his depth. This current bunch are beyond belief. Methven was humiliated by the Sunerland documentary yet him and his highly paid colleges continue in the same disjointed way. This constant leaking of confidential info and dumping storylines to allegedly ITK fans is just to control the narrative to cover up incompetence. I really think we should write an open letter to The Majority Owners expressing our disgust at the total lack of joined up thinking and knee jerk decisions.As usual the selection of a new manager is not only 2 months too late but conducted in a cringeworthy manner. I will eagerly await Ream's investigation Absolutely bang on! Why is it unprofessionalism and why is it bang on? Because somebody says so on another forum? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2024 20:03:05 GMT
Why is it unprofessionalism and why is it bang on? Because somebody says so on another forum? Happen to agree with him sorry if that offends. |
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Jan 30, 2024 20:05:44 GMT
So you are agreeing because somebody on another forum is leaking boardroom affairs.
You have decided it must be true based on bullshit information?
Not offended in the slightest to be honest. It's up to you how you feel but at lease it on substance.
|
|
|
|
Post by westwickhamaddick on Jan 30, 2024 20:06:16 GMT
Know Cawley has been a bit out the loop but he said Jones hasn’t had his meet with them this week. If that is true and the window shuts in 48 hours that suggests to me he isn’t favourite anymore
|
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Jan 30, 2024 20:20:16 GMT
Know Cawley has been a bit out the loop but he said Jones hasn’t had his meet with them this week. If that is true and the window shuts in 48 hours that suggests to me he isn’t favourite anymore Cawley says he hasn't got any manager updates but in the next breath says that Jones is 'yet' to have this week’s meet with them. Isn't that an update in itself? Jones or anyone else could be at the Valley now and Cawley wouldn't have a clue. |
|
|
|
Post by Mundell on Jan 30, 2024 20:22:15 GMT
So you are agreeing with somebody because somebody on another forum is leaking boardroom information. You have decided it must be true based on bullshit information? Not offended in the slightest to be honest. It's up to you how you feel but at lease it on substance. I think there might be a wire crossed here Paul. My understanding of what acientaddick4 posted is that he’s fed up with the CAFC Board behaving thoroughly unprofessionally by leaking the kind of information posted by Dubai (whoever that is) on CL. For what it’s worth, I agree with him. I find it extraordinary that confidential information should be briefed out at such a sensitive time during negotiations. And implying publicly that not all Board members want to appoint Nathan Jones is completely bizarre - even if that’s not exactly what’s meant. None of this is a criticism of you or of the poster on CL. You’re both sharing what you’ve been told in good faith. Nor is anyone doubting your version of events - you’ve been bang on about what’s happening at the club since GFP/SE7 came onto the scene. I think many of us are frankly shocked by the Board’s apparent willingness to recklessly put confidential and sensitive information into the public domain. I may be wrong about @cafc2002 but I suspect this is what they were saying too, not doubting what you’ve been telling us. |
|
|
|
Post by pardew123 on Jan 30, 2024 20:23:52 GMT
Either them 2 would be great Charlton managers I do see the value of Rowett though I think he’s fantastic at what he does and played here briefly
|
|
|
|
Post by kings hill addick on Jan 30, 2024 20:26:53 GMT
Like I said I just don't buy it. All the interviewing is done. They discuss them and Jones is the most impressive interviewee. They then have a show of hands and not all of the go up. Next thing we hear is they suddenly decide they want to interview somebody else with the majority of the board having already nailed their names to the Nathan Jones mast. Total nonsense in my opinion. I'm sorry Reams but I'm not sure that this should have been shared, either. We now have two sources (you and Dubai) that confirm that some (at least one) of the board members don't want Jones to be the manager. I'm quite sure that this will undermine Jones and, frankly, any other candidate if he knows that most of the board members want someone else, i.e. Jones. I know that these decisions come about from discussions at board level but I just don't think this is something that should be in the public domain. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by mersthamred on Jan 30, 2024 20:34:56 GMT
I am sickened by the Unproffessionalism of this current Board. I have supported Charlton for 65 years and never have we been seen as such a basket case.Yes the Spivs were a joke but it was obvious that they were a bunch of Criminals and fans of other clubs felt sorry for us and were even sympathetic. Saanguard was well meaning but out of his depth. This current bunch are beyond belief. Methven was humiliated by the Sunerland documentary yet him and his highly paid colleges continue in the same disjointed way. This constant leaking of confidential info and dumping storylines to allegedly ITK fans is just to control the narrative to cover up incompetence. I really think we should write an open letter to The Majority Owners expressing our disgust at the total lack of joined up thinking and knee jerk decisions.As usual the selection of a new manager is not only 2 months too late but conducted in a cringeworthy manner. I will eagerly await Ream's investigation Totally disagree. Give them time, they are potentially the best owners for a long time. We don't know if the rumour is true anyway. If they appoint Jones and things go wrong we'll say they should have chosen Rowett. Choose Rowett and things go wrong we'll say they should have chosen Jones. |
|
|
|
Post by pardew123 on Jan 30, 2024 20:36:37 GMT
Like choosing between 2 great cars to buy 😂
|
|
|
|
Post by jacobearl99 on Jan 30, 2024 20:55:13 GMT
I am sickened by the Unproffessionalism of this current Board. I have supported Charlton for 65 years and never have we been seen as such a basket case.Yes the Spivs were a joke but it was obvious that they were a bunch of Criminals and fans of other clubs felt sorry for us and were even sympathetic. Saanguard was well meaning but out of his depth. This current bunch are beyond belief. Methven was humiliated by the Sunerland documentary yet him and his highly paid colleges continue in the same disjointed way. This constant leaking of confidential info and dumping storylines to allegedly ITK fans is just to control the narrative to cover up incompetence. I really think we should write an open letter to The Majority Owners expressing our disgust at the total lack of joined up thinking and knee jerk decisions.As usual the selection of a new manager is not only 2 months too late but conducted in a cringeworthy manner. I will eagerly await Ream's investigation what a horrifically weird comment. Shocks me that people have this opinion and vocalise it. |
|
|
|
Post by watameires on Jan 30, 2024 21:01:10 GMT
So who’s peoples money on?
|
|
|
|
Post by se7tolu7 on Jan 30, 2024 21:09:16 GMT
I am sickened by the Unproffessionalism of this current Board. I have supported Charlton for 65 years and never have we been seen as such a basket case.Yes the Spivs were a joke but it was obvious that they were a bunch of Criminals and fans of other clubs felt sorry for us and were even sympathetic. Saanguard was well meaning but out of his depth. This current bunch are beyond belief. Methven was humiliated by the Sunerland documentary yet him and his highly paid colleges continue in the same disjointed way. This constant leaking of confidential info and dumping storylines to allegedly ITK fans is just to control the narrative to cover up incompetence. I really think we should write an open letter to The Majority Owners expressing our disgust at the total lack of joined up thinking and knee jerk decisions.As usual the selection of a new manager is not only 2 months too late but conducted in a cringeworthy manner. I will eagerly await Ream's investigation what a horrifically weird comment. Shocks me that people have this opinion and vocalise it. I actually don’t think what is said here is too far from the truth! Why is it weird? Everybody saw the documentary and what this lot are capable of! |
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Jan 30, 2024 21:09:38 GMT
So you are agreeing with somebody because somebody on another forum is leaking boardroom information. You have decided it must be true based on bullshit information? Not offended in the slightest to be honest. It's up to you how you feel but at lease it on substance. I think there might be a wire crossed here Paul. My understanding of what acientaddick4 posted is that he’s fed up with the CAFC Board behaving thoroughly unprofessionally by leaking the kind of information posted by Dubai (whoever that is) on CL. For what it’s worth, I agree with him. I find it extraordinary that confidential information should be briefed out at such a sensitive time during negotiations. And implying publicly that not all Board members want to appoint Nathan Jones is completely bizarre - even if that’s not exactly what’s meant. None of this is a criticism of you or of the poster on CL. You’re both sharing what you’ve been told in good faith. Nor is anyone doubting your version of events - you’ve been bang on about what’s happening at the club since GFP/SE7 came onto the scene. I think many of us are frankly shocked by the Board’s apparent willingness to recklessly put confidential and sensitive information into the public domain. I may be wrong about @cafc2002 but I suspect this is what they were saying too, not doubting what you’ve been telling us. I understand that Chris I really do but there is a middle ground here which I will explain. Firstly I haven't been told anything along the lines of what Dubai has posted today. Everything I do get told is always based on trust. I ask if I can share most things but there are times when I don't bother because I know what the answer will be. Today for example, If I had been in Dubai's position and heard what he says he has, I wouldn't have gone near it because it has confidentiality written all over it which would have come with a definite and a definite NO when it comes to sharing. Knowing them the way I do, I would be very suprised indeed if the info he has provided came with their permission. If it did then yes, I agree it would have been pure stupidity on their part. I know how they operate which is why I told cafc2002 to be careful about to much notice of what has appeared elsewhere. SE7 do get themselves tangled up at time and shoots themselves in the foot but I don't believe for a minute that they have volunteered such confidential for somebody to divulge on a public fans forum. What I have read is more or less revealing to the club's fanbase that Nathan Jones does not have the full backing of teh board, information which I am sure he is unaware of at this point. It's been well documented that he has a follow up interview which to my knowledge has taken place despite people in some quarters saying it hasn't. Surely if he wasn't a popular choice, the time to inform him of such would have been after he first came in. It would have been far easier to do so. |
|
|
|
Post by newyorkaddick on Jan 30, 2024 21:11:32 GMT
I am sickened by the Unproffessionalism of this current Board. I have supported Charlton for 65 years and never have we been seen as such a basket case.Yes the Spivs were a joke but it was obvious that they were a bunch of Criminals and fans of other clubs felt sorry for us and were even sympathetic. Saanguard was well meaning but out of his depth. This current bunch are beyond belief. Methven was humiliated by the Sunerland documentary yet him and his highly paid colleges continue in the same disjointed way. This constant leaking of confidential info and dumping storylines to allegedly ITK fans is just to control the narrative to cover up incompetence. I really think we should write an open letter to The Majority Owners expressing our disgust at the total lack of joined up thinking and knee jerk decisions.As usual the selection of a new manager is not only 2 months too late but conducted in a cringeworthy manner. I will eagerly await Ream's investigation Totally disagree. Give them time, they are potentially the best owners for a long time. We don't know if the rumour is true anyway. If they appoint Jones and things go wrong we'll say they should have chosen Rowett. Choose Rowett and things go wrong we'll say they should have chosen Jones. It may be corporate governance semantics but none of the CAFC board are owners (at least of >5%).... |
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Jan 30, 2024 21:12:34 GMT
Like I said I just don't buy it. All the interviewing is done. They discuss them and Jones is the most impressive interviewee. They then have a show of hands and not all of the go up. Next thing we hear is they suddenly decide they want to interview somebody else with the majority of the board having already nailed their names to the Nathan Jones mast. Total nonsense in my opinion. I'm sorry Reams but I'm not sure that this should have been shared, either. We now have two sources (you and Dubai) that confirm that some (at least one) of the board members don't want Jones to be the manager. I'm quite sure that this will undermine Jones and, frankly, any other candidate if he knows that most of the board members want someone else, i.e. Jones. I know that these decisions come about from discussions at board level but I just don't think this is something that should be in the public domain. Sorry. I haven't shared anything mate. I was giving a scenario ridiculing what dubai has shared. Would have thought that was obvious. I'm more than comfortable with what I shared last night and confident on that's how the land lies. |
|
|
|
Post by valleyvon on Jan 30, 2024 21:13:45 GMT
So who’s peoples money on? I don’t know but hopefully it is someone good of course. And if any of the rumours are true and some board members are not 100% on board with any particular candidate then that is to be expected I should imagine - it’s very unlikely everyone in the room will have the same opinion and want to crack on with one particular candidate, unless Klopp was on offer! Haha - I should think any candidate will have been around the block enough to know that will be the case most board rooms anyway - you just need a majority. |
|
|
|
Post by revilo on Jan 30, 2024 21:14:29 GMT
Let's be frank here, the SMT have been shit with making decisions so how would they know if Jones would be the right fit for the club. I have barely any belief that they know what they're doing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2024 21:14:30 GMT
So you are agreeing with somebody because somebody on another forum is leaking boardroom information. You have decided it must be true based on bullshit information? Not offended in the slightest to be honest. It's up to you how you feel but at lease it on substance. I think there might be a wire crossed here Paul. My understanding of what acientaddick4 posted is that he’s fed up with the CAFC Board behaving thoroughly unprofessionally by leaking the kind of information posted by Dubai (whoever that is) on CL. For what it’s worth, I agree with him. I find it extraordinary that confidential information should be briefed out at such a sensitive time during negotiations. And implying publicly that not all Board members want to appoint Nathan Jones is completely bizarre - even if that’s not exactly what’s meant. None of this is a criticism of you or of the poster on CL. You’re both sharing what you’ve been told in good faith. Nor is anyone doubting your version of events - you’ve been bang on about what’s happening at the club since GFP/SE7 came onto the scene. I think many of us are frankly shocked by the Board’s apparent willingness to recklessly put confidential and sensitive information into the public domain. I may be wrong about @cafc2002 but I suspect this is what they were saying too, not doubting what you’ve been telling us. 👍 |
|
|
|
Post by petetongthereturn on Jan 30, 2024 21:15:07 GMT
So who’s peoples money on? Jones I hope but my money would go on Fleming. |
|
|
|
Post by kings hill addick on Jan 30, 2024 21:20:45 GMT
I'm sorry Reams but I'm not sure that this should have been shared, either. We now have two sources (you and Dubai) that confirm that some (at least one) of the board members don't want Jones to be the manager. I'm quite sure that this will undermine Jones and, frankly, any other candidate if he knows that most of the board members want someone else, i.e. Jones. I know that these decisions come about from discussions at board level but I just don't think this is something that should be in the public domain. Sorry. I haven't shared anything mate. I was giving a scenario ridiculing what dubai has shared. Would have thought that was obvious. I'm more than comfortable with what I shared last night and confident on that's how the land lies. Sorry. I totally misunderstood. My mistake. |
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Jan 30, 2024 21:23:16 GMT
No problem mate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tom1982 on Jan 30, 2024 21:27:22 GMT
Blimey I’m actually getting concerned now! If they actually had the audacity to give the job to Fleming, even if it was just until the end of the season, I think we might actually go down. Obviously all about opinions but I think we need a manager sorted by tomorrow or we are bang in trouble!
|
|
