|
|
Post by reddyfreddy on Aug 24, 2009 8:59:11 GMT
...out of the blue about something completely unconnected with CAFC but something for their personal benefit, written on CAFC stationery as opposed to their own, would you feel that was taking liberties? This happened to a friend of mine who is not a CAFC fan or for that matter much of a football fan but he saw it as someone attempting to take advantage of what the writer obviously perceived to be a position of status and influence.
At the time I was astonished that an exploratory enquiry relating to a potential business deal should be written on CAFC letterhead for the obvious purpose that it might carry more weight. I see it as unethical.
Nothing came of it as my friend although he did meet with the director in question more out of curiousity than anything else, decided he didn't wish to pursue the issue.
The reason I mention this now is because of the influence that same person could be having on the club's current plight.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2009 10:35:41 GMT
hes been raiding the stationary cupboard !!! sack him !
|
|
|
|
Post by valleyviper on Aug 24, 2009 16:26:50 GMT
If it's not RM, fax a copy to him requesting he may wish to deal with perpetrator himself.
If it is RM, send a copy to Reg, could be written by someone who has been holding up the TO.
Alternatively, get some young journo from the local rag to do a story on the way a Director of CAFC is abusing the privilage of his position within The Club, could lead to a mention on SSN.
|
|
optimist
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 496
|
Post by optimist on Aug 24, 2009 17:42:54 GMT
I think it's unethical, but why am I not surprised? Other than Murray, whose been fairly transparent regarding his position, the others are in the main a mystery to me.
I tend to believe Murray when he says he's accepted he's "done his money" and is ready to move Charlton on with a personal financial loss, but are the others? That has crossed my mind a few times... After saying all that, please tell me it isn’t Murray…
The way this saga has panned out, I'm fairly sure, boardroom influence hasn't entirely been for the best interests of the club...
Even when this thing is all over, I doubt a book the size of War & Peace would cover all the goings on...
|
|
|
|
Post by reddyfreddy on Aug 25, 2009 7:33:00 GMT
I think it's unethical, but why am I not surprised? Other than Murray, whose been fairly transparent regarding his position, the others are in the main a mystery to me. I tend to believe Murray when he says he's accepted he's "done his money" and is ready to move Charlton on with a personal financial loss, but are the others? That has crossed my mind a few times... After saying all that, please tell me it isn’t Murray… The way this saga has panned out, I'm fairly sure, boardroom influence hasn't entirely been for the best interests of the club... Even when this thing is all over, I doubt a book the size of War & Peace would cover all the goings on... No it's not Murray. I'm not wishing to name the person on a public forum either as it would not achieve anything at this time. Might do later though!! It was concerning some land. If one of my people did that I would go mental!! It's abusing their position for self gain. Mention your position at a later stage not as blatant as was done. The person on the board to do this most has been Richard Collins although on this occasion he's not whom I am referring to. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2009 9:07:09 GMT
so , not Murray ,, not Collins,,, is it Wagstaff ?? or Henry the janitor  |
|
