|
|
Post by reamsofverse on Sept 30, 2009 22:28:33 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by reddyfreddy on Oct 1, 2009 6:34:59 GMT
That's Bates for yer!
Was obvious to all and sundry that he had influence thus shares in this company however circuitous the route via how many offshore domains.
The administrators had been forced on a legal technicality by the company in question as the largest creditor (for loans) to work with one specific consortium...yep Bates's even though it wasn't offering anywhere near the best deal to creditors overall. It's immoral...it's business...it's Bates!!
Points deduction, you're joking...more likely Bates to get a knighthood the way things work out in this poxy country at times!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2009 10:21:53 GMT
i very much doubt it, going on the 'fit to own' triad case !!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2009 10:25:53 GMT
|
|
