|
|
Post by mikebassett on May 10, 2022 15:53:29 GMT
Innis and JFC should have gone, for me. Too injury prone, especially given we’re not exactly the best run side so we need bodies that can cope with the rigours of a season in League One and neither seem up to it.
Washington works hard and under competent management I would probably give the club the benefit of the doubt. I’m unsure under Sandgaard whether this is the right move.
|
|
|
|
Post by revilo on May 10, 2022 15:56:12 GMT
JFC did nothing and earns a contract extension. Washington was not to everyone's fancy yet he made a difference and gets binned. How on earth Inniss earned an extension?!
|
|
|
|
Post by norfolkrobin on May 10, 2022 19:29:42 GMT
I get this is a wind up account but he isn’t wrong, I got my info elsewhere. Can’t reveal too much but deal is basically done from what I’ve heard. Signing Marquis is proper league one…. On a free I think that's decent business,bags at this level and as others have said puts himself about,we are too often soft touches,maybe he fancied a move back towards home.Do we believe this rumour has legs then? |
|
|
|
Post by newyorkaddick on May 10, 2022 19:32:08 GMT
We would never sign JFC and Davison if they weren't already here so why the hell are we extending their contracts? Meanwhile we release Washington who is only 29 and clearly a vital player 🤷🏼♂️ . The mind boggles.
|
|
|
|
Post by tonaddick on May 10, 2022 20:55:23 GMT
Really interesting article in today's Athletic on Mason Barstow. He's already playing for Chelsea under 23s this season since leaving us and, according to the article, is unlikely to go out on loan next season.
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorkaddick on May 10, 2022 20:58:59 GMT
Really interesting article in today's Athletic on Mason Barstow. He's already playing for Chelsea under 23s this season since leaving us and, according to the article, is unlikely to go out on loan next season. He has as much chance of making a first team appearance for Chelsea I do |
|
|
|
Post by tonaddick on May 10, 2022 21:02:11 GMT
Really interesting article in today's Athletic on Mason Barstow. He's already playing for Chelsea under 23s this season since leaving us and, according to the article, is unlikely to go out on loan next season. He has as much chance of making a first team appearance for Chelsea as me At the moment possibly. But the article's main pitch was that Chelsea want him to have a season in the under 23s to learn his trade before he goes out on loan. Worth a read if you have a subscription. |
|
|
|
Post by willett on May 10, 2022 21:55:34 GMT
Anyone seen the below on Facebook:
the rumours came about because it was leaked that Jacko told him that he had to play Burstow over Washington due to the deal Sandgaard made with Chelsea. Washington kicked off with Sandgaard Jr and was informed that he wouldn't be getting a new deal anyway as they want to explore cheaper options. Washington took this up with Jacko who couldn't deny it wasn't true. The fact that Jacko then began to select Washington in the starting 11 is probably the reason behind him being sacked. Like we say it's all rumours but the way that Sandgaard is running the club it wouldn't be a surprise if it was all true.
|
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on May 10, 2022 22:02:06 GMT
Sandgaard Junior is a poor man's Thomas Driesen. Both know fuck all about football.
|
|
|
|
Post by owen77 on May 10, 2022 22:50:55 GMT
Is there actually anything to this Marquis stuff or just pure waffle
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2022 22:58:54 GMT
Is there actually anything to this Marquis stuff or just pure waffle Complete bullshit that came from a Twitter account with 3 Followers. |
|
|
|
Post by 1978sussex on May 11, 2022 10:55:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by anthony55 on May 11, 2022 12:11:49 GMT
Washington is a far better player than Davison.
Keeping Davison ahead of Washington is a mistake imo.
As for all the other players released I'm in full agreement they weren't good enough.
Inniss should have gone as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by garrynelson on May 11, 2022 12:43:29 GMT
Are we sure we will actually keep Davisson and not sell him for a fee instead of releasing him?
|
|
|
|
Post by vaangard on May 11, 2022 13:56:04 GMT
Washington is a far better player than Davison. Keeping Davison ahead of Washington is a mistake imo. As for all the other players released I'm in full agreement they weren't good enough. Inniss should have gone as well. By my fag packet calculations, Davison had 15 league games this season, 8 starts and scored 2 goals. Of subs he only once got 30+ minutes. He played a single game with Stockley as a support striker (when the latter was sent off on 17) but otherwise was picked because JS was out. He is barely over 6ft so harsh to judge him playing as a target man during a period we were playing hoofball, he is a better player than that. Only 22 so more to come from him, yet our football experts here have written him off but 9 in 21 from a side only 17 places below us doesn't lie. |
|
|
|
Post by aaronaldo on May 11, 2022 14:37:36 GMT
Are we sure we will actually keep Davisson and not sell him for a fee instead of releasing him? It seems the most logical thing, assuming there is interest. However, it does offer the same issue as this year. What if we sign fuck all (we’ve got fewer strikers now then last year?!) and then are left in the “You’ll do” situation with Davison again as it’s the only option. |
|
|
|
Post by seriouslyred on May 11, 2022 15:10:08 GMT
We would never sign JFC and Davison if they weren't already here so why the hell are we extending their contracts? Meanwhile we release Washington who is only 29 and clearly a vital player 🤷🏼♂️ . The mind boggles. Washington scores goals, whereas Davison hasn't made it. Having Stockley, Washington & Aneke + 1 makes sense JFC and Inniss can both certainly perform at this level - when fit. Point is they are known at the club, and a known risk. We obviously need more talent but the implied message is one of cost cutting. So it's unclear how they can possibly target the play-offs next time. |
|
|
|
Post by sevenoaks on May 11, 2022 16:04:38 GMT
Are we sure we will actually keep Davisson and not sell him for a fee instead of releasing him? I would think, only triggered extra year, so that a fee could be asked.. I very much doubt Davison would want to come back anyway.. |
|
|
|
Post by Mundell on May 11, 2022 16:14:14 GMT
We would never sign JFC and Davison if they weren't already here so why the hell are we extending their contracts? Meanwhile we release Washington who is only 29 and clearly a vital player 🤷🏼♂️ . The mind boggles. Washington scores goals, whereas Davison hasn't made it. Having Stockley, Washington & Aneke + 1 makes sense JFC and Inniss can both certainly perform at this level - when fit. Point is they are known at the club, and a known risk. We obviously need more talent but the implied message is one of cost cutting. So it's unclear how they can possibly target the play-offs next time. I think newyorkaddick is implying that the club is once again guilty of availability bias. That was also a problem last summer, in my view, and contributed to a completely muddled recruitment strategy. |
|
ca1975fc
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 279
|
Post by ca1975fc on May 11, 2022 17:14:34 GMT
Just a bit of fun  |
|
|
|
Post by garrynelson on May 11, 2022 18:19:41 GMT
We need someone proven at L1 level and who would make the step up to the Championship ideally….. |
|
|
|
Post by IpswichAddick on May 11, 2022 19:50:26 GMT
An interesting video from a mate of mine, feel free to give it a watch.
(You'll need to wind it back to the start because of how silly YouTube design themselves)
|
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on May 11, 2022 22:56:14 GMT
Welcome to ITTV mate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2022 5:49:55 GMT
Ignoring the Twitter account with 3 Followers, the John Marquis rumours are not going away.
I can’t see how signing a player like this would complement the owners desire to play a more fluid pressing game.
We shouldn’t be signing players until we have a new manager in place, IMO, which is why a speedy appointment is imperative.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1978sussex on May 12, 2022 7:11:32 GMT
Ignoring the Twitter account with 3 Followers, the John Marquis rumours are not going away. I can’t see how signing a player like this would complement the owners desire to play a more fluid pressing game. We shouldn’t be signing players until we have a new manager in place, IMO, which is why a speedy appointment is imperative. Richard Cawley has said he not heard that charlton are after john maequis, and no deal for any player is close but club is working on deals |
|
|
|
Post by Mundell on May 12, 2022 7:16:34 GMT
Really interesting article in today's Athletic on Mason Barstow. He's already playing for Chelsea under 23s this season since leaving us and, according to the article, is unlikely to go out on loan next season. Thanks for the heads up on this tonaddick I subscribe to The Athletic, but had missed this. The article is interesting. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2022 10:18:29 GMT
Not Charlton related, but a player we are constantly linked with.
Sheff Wed & Ipswich Town in talks with Gillingham’s Jack Tucker - EFL Hub.
|
|
|
|
Post by revilo on May 12, 2022 10:23:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by IpswichAddick on May 12, 2022 10:26:20 GMT
If this was to me mate then I should have mentioned that I used to be called ColchesterAddick but have had a username change. Hope you're well though mate |
|
|
|
Post by reamsofverse on May 12, 2022 10:35:20 GMT
Washington is a far better player than Davison. Keeping Davison ahead of Washington is a mistake imo. As for all the other players released I'm in full agreement they weren't good enough. Inniss should have gone as well. By my fag packet calculations, Davison had 15 league games this season, 8 starts and scored 2 goals. Of subs he only once got 30+ minutes. He played a single game with Stockley as a support striker (when the latter was sent off on 17) but otherwise was picked because JS was out. He is barely over 6ft so harsh to judge him playing as a target man during a period we were playing hoofball, he is a better player than that. Only 22 so more to come from him, yet our football experts here have written him off but 9 in 21 from a side only 17 places below us doesn't lie. I'm more of a football expert than Josh Davison is a footballer put it that way. You try try sugar coating it all you like mate but the fact remains Josh Davison is out of his depth in League football. |
|
